And I only tested this with the free version. So in terms of quality I think it did a great job. The LANDR master had more punch and clarity in the high end and when comparing the two versions I noticed my own master had some muddy frequencies left that were gone in LANDR’s version. It really put an extra layer of quality on top and I was actually disappointed about the quality of my own self-mastered version.Īudio Comparison between unmastered, self-mastered and mastered by LANDR The LANDR version had much more impact and low end than my own master. I have to say I was surprised by the result! It did a much better job than I initially thought was possible for an automated mastering service. The free version generates a 192kbps mp3 file and doesn’t provide you with extra mastering options, but it’s a good way to test out the service. #LANDR COM REVIEW FOR FREE#LANDR allows you to master 2 tracks for free each month. It’s an electronic progressive house track which I mixed with plenty of headroom (10dB) left for mastering. So I signed up for a free account on and uploaded my track. It worked out all right, but I was curious how a service like LANDR would handle it. I put the track to rest for a month, so I could master it with fresh ears because I didn’t have the budget to hire a mastering engineer. I recently mastered a track I produced a while ago, a bad idea, I know. LANDR has been around for a while now, and I finally decided to try it out for myself.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |